mockup-of-an-iphone-11-pro-featuring-a-plain-color-surface-2003-el1 (3).png

Project Overview

House 2 Home is a services marketplace that connects millennial renters and homeowners to local home service professionals.

Challenge

While it is a two-sided platform, the counterpart experience of the product is on the home service professionals providing the services.  The team had to focus on the consumer side of the platform.

 

Role: UX Researcher, UI/UX Designer, Team

Project Duration: 6 weeks

Tools: Sketch, Figma, Invision, Photoshop

Deliverables

01 Research Exploratory Research. Competitive Analysis

02 User Interview Plan and Results

03 Synthesis Persona, Problem Statement, User Stories, Design Principles

04 Sketches and Divergent Wireframes

05 Converging How-Now-Wow Matrix, Storyboard, Brainstorming, and Site Map

06 Solution

07 Usability Test Plan and Results, Recommendations

08 Reiterations

09 Annotated Wireframes

10 Next Steps

11 High-Fidelity Screens, Mood-board


 

The Process

Artboard.png
 

The Problem Statement

The tech savvy millennial homeowner wants an easy and reliable way to conveniently compare quality home service professionals tailored to their home needs in order to make the most informed choice to provide safety, security and the best bang for their buck.


01 Research

My team and I began an in-depth research on the home service industry to get a better understanding of this market. While exploring, we found that the home services industry is worth billions, but millennial homeowners and renters alike report difficulty in finding reliable and affordable contractors that return on the value they promise.

 
1465807.png
 
1935746.png
 

 Qualitative

• Homeowners with dual income, busy lifestyles with no time need a quick and easy way to find a professional-Contractor Digital Marketing Statistics

• The increase of smartphones sold to end users has allowed the rise of the home service market to increase through its positive influence on the online-demand services market -Home Advisor True Cost Repair

• The increase of smartphones sold to end users has allowed the rise of the home service market to increase through its positive influence on the online-demand services market to help. -Forbes

Quantitative

• 64% [ Searches for HVAC services happen on a mobile device ] -Blue Corona 2018

• 88% [ of consumers trust online reviews as much as they trust personal recommendations ] -Search Engine Land

• 50% [ of loyal customers have left a company for a competitor who was able to stay more relevant and better satisfy their needs ] -Blue Corona 2018


 Who are our competitors?

 

We found that our lead direct competitors in this market were Home Advisor, Home Depot while an approaching competitor was Amazon Home Services. These companies offer a wide range of services from licensed professionals while our indirect competitors Handy, TaskRabbit, and Groupon don’t necessarily require individuals to be licensed.

My team and I composed a detailed analysis of the 6 competitors by studying it features. We then compared 2 direct competitors and 1 indirect competitor and noticed some gaps. We were able to conclude:

• Transparency is lacking in the market place

• A need for a well established, vetting system to screen quality licensed professionals

• An option to pay virtually to save time

 
 
 
CompetitiveAnalysislist.jpg
 

02 Understanding our Target Audience

 
planning-icon.png

User Interview Plan

My team and I used two methods to gather user insights. We created a google survey and conducted user interviews. The goals and objectives for our survey and user interviews were to gain a more clear understanding of the needs of homeowners and renters as they relate to hiring home service professionals. By broadening our results, we could better identify our target.

Our participants were:

• 11 user interviews Millennial’s (Ages between 24-40)

• Average household income between 75,000-150,000+

• Single-family homeowners, condo owners, renters, current homeowners and homebuyers

• 42 participants for Google Survey

method-png-1-png-image-method-png-671_671.png

Methodology

Users Interviews were done remotely through zoom sessions

noun_56376.png

Team Roles

Each team member conducted 2 interviews each. We had 11 interviews total.

 
 
 
 

Our Interviews

 
 

User 1

User 1 is a 30 years old business owner for a Salon Supply in Texas. He lives with his wife and dog Percy. They plan on buying a new home next year but maintain their house right now.

quote001.png
 

User 2

User 2 is a 30 years old Air Traffic Controller living in New York. He lives with his wife and recently bought their first house 2 years ago.

quote0002.png
 

Key Takeaway and Insights

  • Many of the participants used virtual scheduling through an app.

  • Credit cards, PayPal, Apple Pay and Amazon pay were among popular methods of payment.

  • People would rather pay through an app if they feel it is safe and trustworthy.

  • Among the services listed, home repairs were used more than home improvement projects. 

  • Security and safety is an important factor for participants hiring home service professionals.

  • Most users emphasized the need for the ability to compare prices as well as reasonable pricing.


Defining our User

 

These are the methods we used to identify our User.

Affinity Diagram

Journey Map


03 Persona

Persona+Pic.jpg

Sarah V is a 30 years old Therapist, married with a child and living in Austin, Texas.

“I am always looking for ways to simplify the challenges in my life “

Problem Statement

The tech savvy millennial homeowner wants an easy and reliable way to conveniently compare quality home service professionals tailored to their home needs in order to make the most informed choice to provide safety, security and the best bang for their buck.

User Stories

As a busy professional…

I need a seamless way to schedule online.

As a consumer…

I want to be able to choose to pay after the work is done. I want whoever I hire to do the work right.

As a User…

who cares about quality experiences, I need each option to be ranked and reviewed by other people so that I can decide if it is worth going to

As a mother…

I want to be able to virtually connect with the home service professional before I make an informed decision.

 Design Principles

Transparent -  Exercising openness and honesty to cultivate trust and certitude with our users and professionals. 

Reliable – Appropriately vetting all professionals and users to ensure professionalism and safety in all areas of our product. 

Sustainable –  Our product will be relevant to our users as well as uniquely tailored to our users.

Excellence – Our users and professionals will always receive the highest quality in both experience and final result.

Effortless –  The approach of removing the friction that would turn customers away in order to earn customer loyalty 


04 Sketches and Wireframes

 
 

6-8-5 Sketches

The strategy my team and I used to approach the problem statement was by doing divergent concepts. For my sketches, I created a comparing prices screen, browsing, online scheduling, payment and chat feature.

 
WireframesI then created mid-fidelity wireframes following the rough sketches. I iterated on a few designs.

Low-Fidelity Wireframes

 

05 Converging our Ideas

 

How-Now-Wow Matrix

Storyboard

Brainstorming

Site Map


06 Solution

Searching for a quality plumbing service, reading company information and reviews

 
2.2.png
3.0.png
3.1.png
3.2-1.png
 

 Scheduling an Appointment

 

Receiving a Video Consultation

 
3.2.3.png
3.2.4.png
 
4.4.png
4.5.png
 

Viewing My Projects, viewing active projects and vetting screen and viewing saved Pros

 
5.0.png
5.1.png
5.2.png
5.3.png
 

Receiving invoice and completing payment

 
5.4.png
5.5.png
5.6.png
 

07 Usability Test Plan and Results

Usability Plan and Prototype testing

 

Analysis

After recruiting and screen, 8 participants tested. We based our results on 4 factors; average completion rate, average error rate, the average time to complete the task, and the average rate of level difficulty for each of the 9 tasks. Users found that level of difficulty was 5 (1 being the most difficult and 5 being the easiest) and a completion rate of 100%. Although, we received a positive outcome our takeaway was how do we decrease the error rate and time to complete tasks.

Key takeaways

How do we get to 0% error rate and how do we decrease the average time to complete tasks from 33 seconds to less than 10 seconds?

data.png
 

Recommendations for Improvement

According to the users, we compiled our user’s test and compiled these recommendations:

  • User’s were confused about bottom navigation and recommended labeling each icon. 

  • User also recommended changing the explore icon to a home icon for less confusion

  • User recommended adding a GPS feature to track the professional before they arrive to your house

  • User recommended to add the service hours in the invoice to better track the hours worked

  • User recommends to add Google Pay to the list of payment options


Reiterations

 

 

 08 Annotated Wireframes

 

09 Next Steps

 

According to the recommendations, my team would:

• Revisit and explore what users like such as re-discover Navigation, GPS included within the app, add service hours to invoice, ets.

• Reiterate on the changes and keep testing

• Create a High-Fidelity Prototype


10 High-Fidelity Screens

11 Moodboard

My team successfully created mid-fidelity screens that would be handed off to the UI team. Below, I created what my vision of the app would look like if I was part of the visual design.

 
1.0.png
3.2.3.png
2.0.png
5.3.png
4.5.png
5.4.png
4.5.png
 
House 2 Home Moodboard.png